Monday, October 12, 2009
Obama and the Nobel
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Elitist Brookfield
Monday, July 6, 2009
Al Frankinstein
Sunday, April 26, 2009
THE BLACK PLAGUE
Friday, April 3, 2009
I wrote this to/for a Financial adviser who I think paints a little to rosey of an economic picture.
I’m writing this to you today because I’m not too happy with guys like you. Don’t get me wrong it’s nothing personal. I think you are a perfectly fine fellow. It’s just the profession that you are in. One of my best friends is a dentist but I hate going to his office. I tell him the only utensile I like to put in my mouth is a fork. When last we spoke ( remember my , “Welcome to the United Socialist States of America comment) I may have seemed to you to be very pessimestic about what will or is going to happen as far as our investments are concerned, or shall we rename them devalued assets, or not quite toxic securities. And then I see, on the Comedy Channel no less, Mad Moneys Bill Cramer getting verbally chastised by John Stewart about exactly what it is that I was so mad about in the first place. I dislike Jon Stewart but he really stuck a chord with me this time. So here is my take on things and what I think a lot of other people are feeling and thinking about at this terrible financial time.
Everyone’s heard and seen investment advice from the print media, websites, and viewers of many financial TV shows and we’ve been told over and over that history's a reliable guide to investing, but then why is it none of these so called investment gurus could have been more on the ball in regards to this crisis we’re all in now. The next time you hear one of these so called gurus opining on where to put your money now, remember that if they really could call market turns, they wouldn't be sharing the information with you without getting paid for it.
Sure, I think that you can find some guidance by looking at the past, but to say that investing in the here and now or the future, where it all can happen the same way over and over again, is pure folly. Lets look at the Wilshire 5000 Index, which includes all
Should prices rise 15 percent a year compounded -- a return reminiscent of the great 1982-2000 bull market -- it would still take five years for stocks to regain their highs of 17 months ago. In other words, stocks would have been dead money (with no return except for dividends) for six-and-a-half years. That means that prices have to more than double to get back to their highs. And that's optimistic, because it assumes a good market through the spring of 2014. Which I think is wishfull thinking at best.
This is the second horrendous bear market we've had since 2000, when the tech-telecom stock bubble burst. It took seven years for stocks to regain those highs.
Consider a recent number that turned traditional investment wisdom upside down.
Historically, stocks have produced the greatest long-term return of any financial asset, and "stocks for the long term" was the traditional mantra. The thinking was that investors took on a worthwhile risk by putting money in stocks rather than taking the guaranteed interest on a U.S. Treasury bond. The idea was that the risk would be justified by stocks posting a better return than bonds. But by the end of 2008, for the first time ever, we saw a 25-year period in which long-term U.S. Treasury bonds actually outperformed the Standard & Poor's 500 stocks.
The numbers, from Ibbotson Associates, a Morningstar company that tracks long-term asset returns, were 11 percent a year, compounded, for bonds, versus 9.77 percent for stocks. When rates fall like that, bond prices soar. But now interest rates on long Treasury bonds are so low that they can't fall much further -- which means bonds don't have a great upside either. The Chinese are shaking in their silk slippers.
I'll tell you this, long term investing, in my book, is twenty five or more plus years. WHICH WE DON”T HAVE! What do these 25-year numbers tell you about how to invest today? Absolutely nothing! And this is my point:
I don’t think that what's happened in the past can, will, or should happen in the future, even if the past covers a long period of investing time. Over the very long haul -- from January 1, 1926, through last Thursday -- the S&P 500 stocks returned 9.37 percent a year in price gains and reinvested dividends, this info is all over the web as of late. The big question is will stocks return anything like that from now on? No one knows. History is one thing, destiny is quite another. That’s what I think, and you can tell ‘Bernie’ to put that in his pipe and smoke it.

